Poznámky
Osnova
360° panoramas
of light pollution domes
shot with a digital camera
Pierre Brunet
Association Nationale pour la Protection du Ciel Nocturne
www.astrosurf.com/anpcn
01 60 82 75 55
Content
Aims
Means
A typical result
Sensibility to the location : correlation to the Cinzano/Falchi/Elvidge/Baugh Atlas of the artificial night sky brightness
Sensibility to the location : moving a few kilometers away
Sensibility to the night hour : 3 hours apart
Sensibility to the time of the year
Sensibility to the meteorological conditions
Conclusion and perspectives
Aims
To show how the light pollution intensity compares to the stars light
To show the extent of light pollution domes
To show how light pollution domes compare between themselves (cities vs cities)
To show how light pollution compare between regions
To give quantitative values (Ü digital camera) (to come)
To give an evolution with time (to come)
The need for a fast and simple procedure :
shooting the whole celestial vault in a single operation
Means
Then
A Single Lens Reflex with a f/1.8-50mm lens,
A stainless steel hemi-spherical bowl (»360° field of view),
And now
A digital camera (Nikon Coolpix 5400) with a f/2.8-5.6mm fish-eye lens (Nikon FC-E9) (190° field of view).
Means :
the present procedure
Digital camera (1):
5 megapixels
100 ASA
f/2.8
3 minutes exposure
Noise reduction (dark frame)
Full resolution in TIF format » 15 Mo.
White balance : daylight
Adobe Photoshop Elements LE 2.0 processing :
Rotating (2) : North to the top
Croping (3)
Filtering (4) :
     polar coordinates →
     cartesian coordinates
Scaling to 95°´360° (5)
A typical result :
Livernon (Lot)
September 25th, 2003, 01h26AM, 5 km NW of Livernon on D2 : Figeac-Livernon airport.
Height 300 m.
Clear.
Level 4 on Bortle scale.
A typical result :
Livernon (Lot)
September 25th, 2003, 01h26AM, 5 km NW of Livernon on D2 : Figeac-Livernon airport.
Height 300 m.
Clear.
Level 4 on Bortle scale.
Sensibility to the location :
correlation to the Cinzano/Falchi/Elvidge
Atlas of the artificial night sky brightness
Snímek 9
Snímek 10
Snímek 11
Sensibility
to the location :
Moving
a few kilometers away
Sensibility to
the night hour :
3 hours apart
Snímek 14
Sensibility to the
meteorological
conditions
Conclusion and perspectives
Agreement between the Cinzano & al. night sky brightness atlas and the field situation (height must be accounted for) ; fair homogeneity of the field situation within each proposed pollution level (white, red,…,grey).
In a given location, there is not much to expect from the time of the year, and quite nothing from the hour in the night.
Meteorological conditions are a key feature, but sky transparency exhibit an asymptotic value according to the pollution levels defined by Cinzano & al.
Digital data may lead to quantitative values for the night sky brightness (to come).
Keeping a same data acquisition procedure give access to the evolution with time of light pollution (to come).
How to pollute an otherwise clear sky
The Rosans (05) case :
A small village brightly lit all through the night…