[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Strawbale] Alternative tightening materials
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 01:14:52 -0500, David Neeley <dbneeley@gmail...>
wrote:
On a well detailed straw bale in which you have paid attention to air
sealing, don't you then run the opposite problem--having inadequate air
changes?
Would it not in such case be prudent to also install an energy recovery
ventilator?
On 03/06/2011 11:02 PM, RT wrote:
strawbale construction methodology is inherently conducive to yielding
air-tight buildings
I don't think that there is any question of the necessity of paying
careful attention to air-sealing
with any well-insulated building, whether it has straw in the walls or not.
Any air-leakage point is a point where bulk moisture from conditioned
interiors will find its way into the envelope materials and condense
somewhere within the cross section.
Once that moisture is in liquid form, it becomes more difficult (than if
it were in vapour phase) for that moisture to get out again even if the
skin materials are vapour permeable. (ie vapour permeable is not liquid
permeable).
So what you have is moisture hanging around for a long time and like
teenagers with too much time on their hands, trouble (in the case of
building materials, microbial activity) is sure to ensue.
If one is relying upon air leakage through the envelope materials to
provide the necessary ventilation air changes, then that ventilation air
is going to be passing through mould/mildew/crud infested materials before
entering the indoor air environment -- certainly not a scenario that is
conducive to creating healthful living space.
So if air-tight construction is a necessity with well-insulated buildings
to preserve the integrity of the materials and avoid potential deleterious
health consequences to the building's occupants, then it necessarily
follows that a ventilation strategy be implemented as well to ensure the
necessary air changes to provide good indoor air quality.
And since the minimum (ie the worst that the Codes will allow) ventilation
rate requires that the entire
volume of air inside the house (air which you have spent energy to
condition) be changed a minimum of ~8.4 times a day ... (ie you need to
the empty the house of air that has been heated/humidified to 18-21 degC
/~20 - 25% RH and replace it with fresh outdoor air (which might be at
minus 20 or minus 40 degC and containing almost no moisture) that has to
be warmed up to 18 - 21 degC at least eight and a half times every day ...
and since any energy recovery ventilator worth considering will recover 75
to 95 percent of the energy from the stale air exhaust stream, I think
that the choice is a no-brainer (and a Code requirement here in Ontario).
--
=== * ===
Rob Tom
Kanata, Ontario, Canada
< A r c h i L o g i c at Y a h o o dot c a >
manually winnow the chaff from my edress if you hit "reply"