From: asbn <asbn@baubiologie...>
Peter, this is wrong...
These are not the official R-values for Germany. The official R-
Value for
usual strawbales in Germany and Austria is 0,045 W/mK.
These are the R-Values for "Baustrohballen", special bales tested
under
special circumstances.
And it is an old but wrong conclusion, that the worse R-values are
more
realistic.
We developed and tested those special strawbales for the building-
industry
(for prefabricated walls and roofs) in 2008/2009 again in Austria
and had
much better results in 2 different official testing-institutions:
0,047 W/mK
(inluding the 20% addition) ? although there is no test-paper
available yet
(we are still optimizing...).
The difference between "normal" strawbales and "Baustrohballen" is the
testing-procedure according to EU-building-codes, but it is possible
to
press those building-bales for prefabrication in a whole different
way, than
Dirk did. It's all about pressing the bales in the best way.
So we will have CE-certified "Baustrohballen" with nearly the same
good
R-values as the R-values for normal strawbales in Austria and
Germany this
summer.
Best wishes, Herbert
--
asbn - austrian strawbale network
?sterreichisches Netzwerk f?r Strohballenbau
3720 Ravelsbach, Baierdorf 6
Email: asbn@baubiologie...
http://www.baubiologie.at
Hi Andr?,
Below the response from Dirk Scharmer of the German Straw Bale
Building association FASBA, when I asked him to comment on the 0,045
figure I had found on their site (http://www.downloads.fasba.de/Pb-lambda1.pdf
). Dirk's basically saying that in Germany the official values to
calculate with are 0,08 (for bales flat) and 0,052 (for bales on
edge)
and that these figures are 20% higher than the measured ones because
in Germany there's an obligation (for all natural fibre-based
insulation) to add 20% to compensate for the fact that the lambda
test
are done on dry material whereas in the real world relative humidity
of 75-95% in the walls do mean that insulation values decrease. He
finishes with saying that these official 'calculation' values are not
as good as the Austrian ones, but more realistic (according to him).
Hope this helps.
Regards, Peter
PS: their values are valid for densities 90-110kg/m3