RE: [Strawbale] convection currents within a straw bale wall?

["paul sheraton" <psheraton@hotmail...>]

"There have been reports of "failed" straw walls in NE America with some  
admitting the damage was likely  caused by dampness but no  admission of the 
dampness being caused by convection currents within a wall, therefore no 
remediation has been undertaken as it has not been proved. Which of course 
means here  "business as usual"


I wonder how many of these failed walls were plastered with a cement based 
render/stucco?
I know the Americans like their straw bale buildings cement stuccoed.

I think if you are going to use an organic material in a buildings 
structure, provision for air movement  through that structure becomes 
paramount, even at the loss of thermal performance.

"sealing" in a straw bale wall with cement plaster seams like asking for 
trouble unless it is a dry climate.

It would be interesting and very useful to have a reference to straw bale 
wall "failures" to learn from, is anyone making a comprehensive record of 
these situations?

let it move, let it breathe!

> From: "Michael lough" <michaelklough@sympatico...>
> Reply-To: mkl18@pobox...,        European strawbale building 
> discussions<strawbale@amper....muni.cz>
> To: strawbale@amper....muni.cz
> Subject: [Strawbale] convection currents within a straw bale wall?
> Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 13:07:49 +0000
>
> Mark said?
>
> There is a disparity between directly-measured U-values for strawbale walls 
> and U-values calculated from measured thermal conductivity of bale samples; 
> the best explanation anyone has been able to give for this is slow 
> convection currents in - or rather around the outside of - the bale wall.  
> The disparity was worst in the case of the least professionally plastered 
> test in the US.  I would therefore expect the thermal performance of a 
> system which uses cladding _instead of_ external render to be substandard.
>
>
> This seems akin to the "theory " that there is the possibility of  moisture 
> produced within a bale wall being part of the convection current. And this 
> being condensed at the top to moisten the outside top wall and in worst 
> case scenarios (presumably in more humid climates) maintain a permananent 
> risen damp within the straw bale wall which could if not in a few months 
> probably over years produce the conditions for microbial activity ??
>
> I understand someone called Jenik is active with unfunded experiments in 
> Europe to  test various methods of stopping this moisture transfer.  Do we 
> assume by his activity and your acknowledgement of  a concensus on the 
> probability of convection currents in a straw bale wall that there is room 
> for concern in parts of the world where humidity is a factor such as 
> Northern  Europe and parts of North America? There have been reports of 
> "failed" straw walls in NE America with some  admitting the damage was 
> likely  caused by dampness but no  admission of the dampness being caused 
> by convection currents within a wall, therefore no remediation has been 
> undertaken as it has not been proved. Which of course means here  "business 
> as usual".
>
>
> Care to comment?
>
>
> Thankyou
>
> Michael Lough
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
>    European strawbale building discussion list
>
> Send all messages to:
> Strawbale@amper....muni.cz
>
> Archives, subscription options, etc:
> http://amper.ped.muni.cz/mailman/listinfo/strawbale
> ____________________________________________________