[Strawbale] Re: Brilliance is subjective
Rob Tom
ArchiLogic at yahoo...
Fri Jun 1 18:00:46 CEST 2007
On Thu, 31 May 2007 21:16:48 -0400, Catherine Wanek
<blackrange at zianet...> wrote:
> Thus Ted had to use rebar pins,
> wire mesh, etc., which many experienced straw-bale builders now would
> choose to avoid. Therein (I believe) lie Rob Tom's criticisms.
Actually, "no".
As mentioned, it has been a number of years since I first saw the DVD but
a few of the items that come to mind now (aside from the above) have more
to do with basic building techniques/methods and basic design that would
apply to buildings of any sort, not having anything to do with Code
restrictions/prescriptions.
ie Foundation forming technique
Concrete finishing method (aside from the acid-etched concrete choice)
Framing technique
Sheet metal roofing technique
"Passive solar" design
... all of which were done improperly and/or just plain badly and to
suggest that they were done with any degree of "awareness" is simply
inaccurate.
"Awareness" suggests to me that one first has an understanding of the
basics and having contemplated them, implemented changes that are an
improvement upon the norm .
That was not the case in the BWA DVD that I viewed.
--
=== * ===
Rob Tom
Kanata, Ontario, Canada
< A r c h i L o g i c at C h a f f Y a h o o dot C a >
(winnow the chaff from my edress in your reply)
More information about the Strawbale
mailing list