‹záhlaví›
‹datum a čas›
Cliquez pour modifier les styles du texte du masque
Deuxième niveau
Troisième niveau
Quatrième niveau
Cinquième niveau
‹zápatí›
‹#›
I am Pierre Brunet from ANPCN
My presentation will show you what can be expected from a digital camera for showing light pollution domes extension and intensity. The superiority of a digital camera over a film camera is the more linear response to light intensity, that gives way to quantitative information. But at this time, my presentation is restricted to a qualitative exploitation. Well, more or less, as you will see.
Here is the content.
After exposing the way the night sky pictures are acquired, I will show you what kind of information may be derived from them. Especially if there is some correlation between these field recordings, and the Cinzano Atlas of the artificial night sky brightness. We’ll see also in any improvement in the sky transparency may be expected with the night hour, the season in the year, or the meteorological conditions.
When recording night sky photographs there are a few purposes we are looking for : To show how light pollution intensity compares to the stars light. The higher is the light pollution intensity, the lesser are the stars we can see. Astronomers knows that for a long time. In fact, it is quite easy to evaluate the loss in stars for a given artificial/natural night sky brightness rati Another purpose may be to map the extent of the light pollution domes above the horizon. To show how light pollution domes compare between themselves. In fact it is a powerful way to compare