Biochar is a new term, denoting char made from BIOmass for the purpose to be returned into BIOsphere, by applying the char to soils to increase their fertility. Biochar has been used thousands of years in various parts of the world, with amazing results, unnoticed by science. Its recently recognised additional virtue is a reliable long-term storage of carbon in a form which is order(s) of magnitude more stable than uncharred biomass carbon on/in soils. Turning a part of dead biomass into char instead of letting it decompose completely by biological processes or burning it "to ash" is the most promising way of taking carbon away from quick natural cycles. Char in general can be made even from polymers produced in factories. And, technologically, there is no large difference between production of char to be used as a fuel -- called charcoal -- and to be used as a soil amendment. Large final particles are desirable for charcoal, small ones are needed for biochar application. Small-grained biomass is the best raw material for producing biochar. UN wants biochar to become a part of carbon trading. It will be a part of Copenhagen agenda in December. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biochar gives a good overview. A recent Economist article on biochar it mentions the Boulder/Colorado conference held in August, see http://www.economist.com/sciencetechnology/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14302001 -- the website http://biochar-international.org of the International Biochar Initiative points to it and to all relevant information on biochar in general, especially to the 2009 book "Biochar for Environmental management: science and technology". From the Colorado conference, video files are available already, see http://biochar-international.org/north/american/conference and the link from there. Restructuring biomass utilisation on a global scale to achieve maximum carbon storage will demand more research and huge effort. At the end, it could produce a steady carbon flux away FROM the atmosphere amounting to about 1 Gt/a, one tenth of the present man-made flux TO the atmosphere. Meanwhile, it is desirable to process at least all existing bio-waste fluxes this way, instead of composting (with almost all carbon escaping to the atmosphere soon, some in the form of methane) or burning them completely. And, in many cases, current thermal efficiency of using precious biomass is so low (cooking in developing countries being a prime example) and the accompanying pollution so large (soot -- a strong greenhouse agent, respiratory diseases from smoke), that biochar-producing stoves may actually improve the situation tremendously, in spite of leaving the char unused thermally. Portable or stationary charring stoves are a technology which should spread globally within a decade, with rich countries taking a lead. The future of Earth depends on stopping the use of coal and other fossil fuels soon enough. And then, on being content with at most two thirds of energy content of biomass from forestry and agriculture -- the remaining part is to be brought back to the sediments as char to remain there for centuries and millenia. An atmosphere compatible with our civilisation and nature as it existed during its evolution can be restored this way -- maybe only this way.